Free Anti-graft Body Govt can still withdraw any case at
will Zayadul
Ahsan
Although the new legislation,
Anti-Corruption Commission Act, will allow independent
investigation and prosecution of anyone involved in
corruption, the government secretly kept its trump card:
it can withdraw any case at will, even at the trial
stage.
The act uses the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1958 as a
base for prosecuting anyone. Section 10 (4) of the
criminal law reads: "No prosecution under this act
against any person either generally or in respect of
anyone or more of the offences for which he is being
tried shall be withdrawn except under the order in
writing of the government."
The clause erodes the power of the anti-graft
commission awaiting approval of President Iajuddin
Ahmed, as the government's authority to withdraw cases
will take the steam off the commission's war on
corruption, a senior lawyer said.
Despite the fact that formation of the commission was
one of the key poll pledges of the four-party coalition
leader Bangladesh Nationalist Party, the government was
soft-pedalling on the issue described as vital in a
country, rated the world's most corrupt country for
three successive years by Transparency International.
Hammered by donor agencies and the civil society, the
government introduced the bill in parliament seven
months ago, but came under immediate fire for designing
the law in a way that would present a drag on the
formation of a truly independent commission.
After seven months of discussion and arguments, the
bill took a reasonably acceptable shape and the
government hinted at approving it on February 17.
But on February 9, the Parliamentary Standing
Committee on Law Ministry added a clause to the bill,
tagging it with the criminal law for the prosecution of
an accused.
Section 6 (5) of the criminal law says when an
investigation officer submits a chargesheet against a
state official, it must carry a government permission
letter. Without the permission letter, a judge will not
accept the chargesheet.
As The Daily Star exposed the government move, the
ruling party in the last moment amended this part of the
Anti-Corruption Commission Act on Tuesday before passing
it. The amendment ended the application of Section 6 (5
and 6) of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1958 to the
anti-graft law.
Yet there are several inconsistencies in the act that
question the government's sincerity to fight corruption.
The law says the government will decide the budget
and organisational structure of the commission, making
the anti-raft body reliant on the government and giving
the administration an edge to influence it.
The jurisdiction of the commission pales beside the
Bureau of Anti-Corruption (Bac) that uses 16
full-fledged laws and 47 sections of the penal code. The
commission, which will replace the bureau, will use only
one full-fledged law and 17 sections of the penal code.
The commission will not be able to prosecute people
accused of money laundering and customs, banking,
passport frauds.
The government has been given the authority to
trouble-shoot any confusion arising out of the
commission's power and responsibility, leaving a channel
open for the government's intervention.
The law allows a judge to presume people guilty and
punish them -- a concept against the traditional justice
system that requires the proof of guilt to punish
anybody.
To avoid conflict of interest, the draft of the
anti-graft bill said the commission members would not
work anywhere else. But the passed bill deleted the
part.
The bill provides for appointment of the immediate
past or a former cabinet secretary as a member of the
selection body of the commission, without an eligibility
clause.
The bill allows the commission to put anyone behind
bars for three years for hindering any witness, but does
not state under which law the punishment will be given.
|